SHYAMU @ SHYAMU KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OD HOME LKO.
BAIL/5026/2025 · 2025-11-06
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183140 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183140 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5026 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 472 of 2024, under Sections 85, 80(2), 238(b), 351(3) B.N.S. & section 3/4 D. P. Act, Police Station - Raunahi, District - Faizabad (now Ayodhya).
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in terms of the FIR it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was married with the applicant. Subsequently, the entire matrimonial family killed her daughter for dowry. The cause of death was snake bite and no post mortem was conducted.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts aforesaid as also that the victim had love marriage with the applicant, who is husband, and the applicant is in custody since 25.09.2024 and has no criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant- Shyamu @ Shyamu Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Srees Kumar Srivastava, Amit Tewari, Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shyamu @ Shyamu Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Deptt. Od Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 6, 2025 Mohit Singh/- BAIL No. 5026 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench