Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18314 (RAJ)

M/S SARAF ELECTRICALS PRIVATE LIMITED v. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

CRES/202/2025 · 2025-08-04

Anand Sharma, K R Shriram

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:29707-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Misc. Restoration Application No. 202/2025 In D.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 261/2024 M/s Saraf Electricals Private Limited, Rampura Phul, District Bhatinda (Punjab) Through Authorized Representative, Sh. Rajesh Kumar Garg. ----Applicant Versus 1. Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Office Of Superintending Engineer(Mm), Old Power House, Near Ram Mandir, Bani Park, Jaipur Through Authorized Officer. 2. Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Through Chairman, Old Power House, Near Ram Mandir, Bani Park, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Ravi Jangir on behalf of Mr. Achintya Kaushik HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K.R. SHRIRAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 04/08/2025 1. Counsel for applicant is seeking an adjournment on the ground that advocate is unavailable. 2. This is a restoration application to restore an appeal that came to be dismissed on 30th April 2025. 3. Order dated 30th April 2025 reads as under: “1. None appear on behalf of the appellant inspite of two pass overs. 2. The appellant has remained unrepresented consistently on 06.01.2025, 07.02.2025, 25.02.2025, 28.03.2025. Similar is the position today. 3. It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. “ [2025:RJ-JP:29707-DB] (2 of 2) [CRES-202/2025] 4. It is once again obvious that applicant is not interested in pursuing the matter. 5. Application dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J (K.R. SHRIRAM),CJ SANJAY KUMAWAT/RAHUL/21