HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10370 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. None appears for National Highway Authority of India. 3. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated July 3, 2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however, the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.3 i.e. The National Highway Authority of India through Land Acquisition Officer, Ayodhya Project Office, District Ayodhya should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.3 i.e. The National Highway Authority of India through Land Acquisition Officer, Ayodhya Project Office, District Ayodhya is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Ateeq Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Ambrish Rai, C.S.C. Rahul Kori .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Ministry Of Road Transport Deptt. Road New Delhi And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 14, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- WRIC No. 10370 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench