RAJARAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 2 OTHERS
/10398/2025 · 2025-11-27
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183128 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183128 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10398 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the cause of action in the instant case has already been exhausted and the victim has been recovered, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 27, 2025 R Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Digvijay Singh Yadav, Shikha Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Rajaram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM ASARE MORYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench