HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7122 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Krishna Lal Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Kunda, District - Pratapgarh, to decide Suit No. 208 of 2012 (Computerized Case No. T 201702574401211) - Smt. Tulsa Singh and 2 Others Vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others, U/S 229Kh of U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Kunda, District - Pratapgarh, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Kunda, District - Pratapgarh, is directed to decide Suit No. 208 of 2012 (Computerized Case No. T 201702574401211) - Smt. Tulsa Singh and 2 Others Vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others, U/S 229Kh of U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment, subject to the condition that petitioner cooperates in the proceedings before the Sub Divisional Magistrate and shall appear on all the dates fixed by the Court concerned. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 10, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Lal Yadav, Aparna Sinha, Krishna Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta, Prashant Kumar Srivastava (Alok Mathur,J.) Smt. Tulsa Singh @ Tulsa Devi And Others .....Petitioner(s) The Court Of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kunda, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench