VIJAY PAL v. U.P JAL NIGAM THRU CHAIRMAN LKO and ORS
WRIA/6999/2017 · 2025-11-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183118 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183118 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6999 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 19, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : I.P Singh, Subhash Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vijay Pal .....Petitioner(s) U.P Jal Nigam Thru Chairman Lko And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench