KRISHNA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/11449/2025 · 2025-11-25
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183104 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183104 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11449 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 3 has been accepted by the Office of the Chief Standing Counsel.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner prays for the following reliefs:-
"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the concerned opposite parties mentioned hereinabove to take final decision pursuant to the show cause notice dated 16/10/2025 and in view of enquiry report dated 03/09/2025, and pass final order regarding removal of opposite party no.4, exercising powers under section 95(1)(g)(iii) of the Uttar Pradesh Pnchayat Raj Act, 1947 and relevant enquiry rules of 1997 mentioned hereinabove, expeditiously, within specific period of time. II. Award costs in favour of the petitioner and against the opposite parties."
2. A specific query was put to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether he has locus to maintain the petition inasmuch as it has been informed that the petitioner was the complainant upon which the proceedings have been initiated against the private-respondents. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vaibhav Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Krishna Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
3. Learned standing counsel has provided a copy of the written instructions, which is taken on record and it would reveal that a show cause notice has been received by the private-respondents only on 06.11.2025.
4. In this view of the matter, where the matter is already seized by the authority concerned, this Court finds that there is no cause for passing of any specific order at this stage and needless to say considering the nature of inquiry, the authorities are expected to decide and take it to a logical conclusion with expedition.
5. In view of the aforesaid, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition which is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid observations.
November 25, 2025 Rakesh/- WRIC No. 11449 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench