Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183100 (ALL)

VIKAS v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/7677/2025 · 2025-11-11

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7677 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.233 of 2025, under Sections 65(1), 137(2), 352, 351(3) of BNS; Section 5/6 & 3/4 of POCSO Act and Section 3(2)V, 3(2)Va, 3(1)Da, Dha of SC/ST Act, Police Station Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the niece of the informant aged about 15 years was enticed by the applicant and wrong was also committed. In the statement 183 of BNSS, the victim did not support the prosecution story and stated that she was called by the applicant and both of them had gone on a motorcycle where physical relations were formed. She also admitted that she knew the applicant since long. The victim refused to undergo medical examination. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the statement of the victim not supporting the prosecution story and there is no material to corroborate the allegation levelled and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since03.06.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Kumar Yadav, Anoop Vajpayee, Vikas Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vikas .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Vikas be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 11, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 7677 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench