Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1831 (BOM)

MANGESH TUKARAM PADWAL v. SUNITA MANGESH PADWAL

IA/10260/2025 · 2026-06-17

Shri Shivkumar Dige

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

92-IA-10260-2025 (C).doc Shubhada S Kadam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10260 OF 2025 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO. 17842 OF 2025 Mangesh Tukaram Padwal ...Applicant/s versus Sunita Mangesh Padwal ...Respondent/s _________________________________________________________________ Ms. Pooja Makhija (through VC) along with Mr. Shashank P., Advocate for Applicant/s. Mr. Nitesh S. Nevshe along with Ms. Shweta N. Nevshe and Ms. Arti Bajpai, Advocate for the Respondent. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 17th JUNE, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for respondent. 2. By this application, applicant is seeking condonation of 30 days’ delay for filing the revision application. 3. Considering the submissions of both learned counsel and the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay of 30 days for filing the revision application is condoned. The interim application is allowed and disposed of. 4. The revision application be registered and be listed on 30th June 2026. 5. The applicant shall deposit 50% of arrears of maintenance by next date of hearing. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2026.06.19 11:38:23 +0530