VIRENDRA v. NAIB TEHSILDAR DIYARA TEHSIL JAISINGHPUR DISTT. SULTANPUR AND 2 OTHERS
/6981/2025 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183099 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183099 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6981 of 2025 Court No. - 22 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
1. Heard Shri Rakesh Kumar Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents.
2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:-
" (i) to direct the opposite party no.1 to decide the mutation proceedings under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 in Case No. T202404680702549, namely,
"Ram Asare Vs. Jai Prakash Soni" village Pahadpur Raipatti, Pargana Aldeymau, District Sultanpur, in which the mutation application is pending since long, expeditiously preferably within a stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that proceedings under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending since 2024, therefore a direction be issued to decide the same in the light of Rule 34 (7) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016.
4. Considering the aforesaid submissions, I found that there is statute mandate to decide the disputed case of mutation within a period of 90 days as per Rule 34(7) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, therefore the Naib Tehsildar, Diyara, Tehsil Jaisinghpur, District Sultanpur is directed to decide the proceedings under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code bearing Case No. T202404680702549, namely, "Ram Asare Vs. Jai Prakash Soni" Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Nayak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Virendra .....Petitioner(s) Naib Tehsildar Diyara Tehsil Jaisinghpur Distt. Sultanpur And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
as expeditiously as possible, within a period of 90 days strictly, in accordance with the direction issued in the case of Daya Shankar Vs. State of U.P. and others 2023 (6) A.D.J. 181.
5. With the aforesaid observations, the present petition is disposed of. December 2, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6981 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench