HARIVILAS PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 16 OTHERS
/10976/2025 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183091 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183091 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10976 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. From perusal of the writ petition, it is clear that present writ petition is with respect to the private dispute between the petitioner and respondent nos.6 to
17. It also transpires that an application under Section 116 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 (in short "Code of 2006") was allowed and subsequently, an appeal under Section 207 of Code of 2006 is pending. In light of the same, we are of the view that writ Court cannot interfere at this stage. The petitioner shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the appellate Court and/or any other authority for redressal of his grievance. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 26, 2025 Mohit Singh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manuvendra Singh, Shubham Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Harivilas Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 16 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench