Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183090 (ALL)

NITIN KUMAR @ TIDDI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/1240/2025 · 2025-11-19

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1240 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.132 of 2024, under sections 376(3), 506 IPC, Sections 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Aaspur Deosara, District Pratapgarh. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of informant aged about 15 years was gone out of her home at about 5:30 PM when the applicant caught hold and committed wrong on her. Similar statement was given under Section 161 Cr.P.C. The medical of the victim was done on the very next day i.e. on 24.5.2024 which did not indicate presence of any injury corroborating the allegations levelled. There is no definite document with regard to exact age of the victim. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the medical not corroborating the allowance the applicant, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 24.5.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Nitin Kumar @ Tiddi be released on bail in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jai Pratap Singh, Diwakar Singh Kaushik, Seema Kashyap Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Nitin Kumar @ Tiddi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 19, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 1240 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench