1 2025:CGHC:13052 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2479 of 2021 • M/s Gauri Shankar Agrawal (Shri Gayatri Rice Mill) Proprietor Gauri Shankar Agrawal, S/o Late Shri Sadhuram Agrawal, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Village Baradwar, Ward No. 05, Nehru Chowk, Tehsil And P. S. Baradwar, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Food Corporation Of India Through Its Managing Director, 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi 3. Food Corporation Of India Through Its Executive Director, 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi 4. Food Corporation Of India Through Its General Manager (Region), Regional Officer Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5. Collector Janjgir Champa (Food Supply) District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 6. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Sangh Maryadit Through Managing Director, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 7. District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Sangh Maryadit, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 8. The District Manager Department Of Civil Supply Corporation, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 9. Divisional Manager, Food Corporation Of India Division Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 10. Manager, Food Corporation Of India Sakti, District Janjgir Champa SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.03.19 17:42:39 +0530 2 Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For State : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General For Respondents No. 6 & 7 : Mr. Ashish Surana, Advocate along with Mr. Chetan Singh Chouhan, Advocate For Respondents No. 2,3, 4 : Mr. Pranav Tiwari, Advocate holding the brief 9 and 10 of Mr. B.P. Gupta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 19. 03.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous. 2. No objection from the other side. 3. Taking into consideration the statement made by Mr. Khan, the instant petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant