Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010252672017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17881/2017 Between:
1. S. AYYAVARU REDDY, S/O CHINNA ANKI REDDY, AGED 43 YEARS, SECONDARY GRADE TEACHER, NETAJI AIDED PRIMARY SCHOOL, VEERAPUNAYUNIPALLY IVILLAGE AND MANDAL, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE CORRESPONDANT, SRI SANGAMESHWARA AIDED HIGH SCHOOL, VEERAPUNAYUNIPALLY IVILLAGE AND MANDAL, Y.S.R.
DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA, Y.S.R.DISTRICT
3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 4. THE COMMISSIONER DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, IBRAHIMPATNAM, AMRAVATHI, KRISHNA DISTRICT,A.P.
5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,AMARAVATHI, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. C SAI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP)
2. T V S KUMAR
2
The Court made the following ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief:
“….to issue an order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in notifying the post of School Assistant Maths, to fill up the same by direct recruitment, vide Advertisement dated 4.5.2017 is in violation of Rule 12 (2A)(i) of A.P. Education Institutions (Establishment, recognition, administration and Control of Rules under Private Managements) Rules, 1993 issued under G.O.Ms.No.75, Education (P.S.2) Department dt.1.1.1994, orders issued at Para 7 (4) of G.O.Ms.No.75, School Education (P.S.2)Dept. dt.23.09.2002 and in Memo.No.18836/SE.PS/AI/2012dt.16.12.2016 and Memo. No.19375/PS/AI/2012 dt.1.2.2017 instead of filling the said post by promotion as per the said provision, as illegal, arbitrary, unfair, unjust, contrary to the rules and orders issued by the Government from time to time and consequently direct the respondents to consider case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of School Assistant Maths in terms of the above rules and orders of the Government with all consequential benefits….”
2. On 07.08.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption „for dismissal’. 3. Today also, despite the matter being listed under the caption „for dismissal‟, none appeared for the petitioner. From this, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
There shall be no order as to costs. 3
As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 04.09.2025 Ivd
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.17881 of 2017
Date: 04.09.2025
Ivd