Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183088 (ALL)

RADHEY SHYAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPT.

/4957/2024 · 2025-11-19

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4957 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Nirankar Singh, who has filed Vakalatama on behalf of complainant. The Vakalatnma is taken on record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.436 of 2023, under Sections 302, 307, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Kothi, District Barabanki. 3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that on the same allegation, the co-accused Ram Babu has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 29.09.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.6417 of 2024. 4. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned Counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the co-accused, who has been enlarged on bail and adopting the same reasoning contained in the order dated 29.10.2025 coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 11.10.2023, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dilip Kumar Singh Chauhan, Vinay Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Swatantra Lata Yadav Radhey Shyam .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Dept. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Let the applicant Radhey Shyam be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 19, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 4957 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench