VIKASH KUMAR SHAW AND ORS v. BANK OF BARODA AND ORS
WPA/6592/2011 · 2025-08-04
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18308 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18308 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
4.8.2025
Sl. No. 12.
Ct.No.7
samarpita
WPA 6592 of 2011 Vikash Kumar Shaw & Ors. Vs. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
None appears on behalf of both the parties, nor any accommodation being sought for. Challenging the action taken by the secured creditor for recovery of dues from the petitioner and the notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFASI Act, 2002, the present writ petition was preferred. Due to existence of efficacious alternative remedy this writ petition cannot be entertained. In view thereof, the writ petition being WPA 6592 of 2011 is dismissed. No order as to costs.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)