SHAILCHANDRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/7783/2025 · 2025-11-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183078 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183078 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7783 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. The applicant prays for and is permitted to correct the memo of the bail application during the course of the day.
3. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
4. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.212 of 2025, under sections 69 and 351(3) BNS, P.S. Jaidpur, District Barabanki.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the informant had met the applicant and on the false pretext of marriage physical relations were formed in between them on various occasions. The tentative age of the victim is around 20 years. Subsequently the bail of the applicant has been rejected under the added Section 351(3) also which has been brought on record by means of supplementary affidavit.
6. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
7. Considering the fact that the relationship was formed on various occasions, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 22.6.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shailchandra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
8. Let the applicant Shailchandra be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 13, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 7783 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench