HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5360 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit, which is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Sudhaker Prakash, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records. 3. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No. 259/2024, under Sections 147, 323, 325, 504, 506, 308, IPC, Police Station Rampur Mathura, District Sitapur. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is also stated that on similar allegations the co-accused Garibe and Ram Kishor alias Kishor have been granted anticipatory bail by Coordinate Benches vide orders dated 15.07.2025 and 05.08.2025 in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. Nos. 776 of 2025 and 862 of 2025 respectively. It is also alleged that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is in jail since 19.07.2024. It is also alleged that the applicant is entitled to liberty of bail on the ground of parity. 5. Learned A.G.A. Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav has opposed the prayer for bail, but he does not dispute the facts stated above. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case particularly the fact on similar allegations the co-accused Garibe and Ram Kishor alias Kishor have been granted anticipatory bail by a Coordinate Benches, it is a fit case for bail. The application is accordingly allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhaker Prakash, Hari Nath Singh, Karnika Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ankit Mishra, Chaitanya Shikhar Sharma Kunnu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Let the applicant Kannu be released on bail in the aforesaid F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0259 of 2024 on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, on the following conditions: (i) the applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant will not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant will appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. December 1, 2025 A.Nigam BAIL No. 5360 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench