Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183060 (ALL)

PRATIBHA KASHYAP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF AGRICULTURE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/12807/2025 · 2025-11-04

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12807 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to provide retiral benefits to petitioner being legal heir of late Beena Devi Kashyap. The benefits sought is with regard to General Provident Fund, leave encashment, gratuity, arrears of pension and insurance along with interest. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before authority concerned. In case such a representation is filed, opposite party no.3 and 4 conjointly shall consider and decide the grievance of petitioner after affording opportunity of hearing to all heirs and claimants of late Beena Devi Kashyap. Such decision shall be taken within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 4, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar, Jitendra Singh, Prabhakar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Pratibha Kashyap .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Agriculture Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench