217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-4870-2025 Date of Decision: 30.01.2025 RITESH SOOD ... PETITIONER VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS .. RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate Mr. Imran Ahmad Ali, Advocate and Ms. Amarpreet Kooner, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Akshay Kumar, AAG, Punjab. ****** ANOOP CHITKARA , J.(ORAL Seeking issuance of dirctions to respondents No. 1 to 3 to give seven days advance notice to the petitioner in case he is required with regard to any cognizable offence on the complaint submitted by respondents No. 4 and 5. 2. In response to the order dated 28.01.2025, short reply by way of affidavit filed by State counsel in Court today is taken on record. In paragarh No. 5 of the reply, it has been mentioned that the petitioner did not join inquiry proceedings before the concerned Deputy Superintendent of Police. 3. Since the allegations are made against the Deputy Superintendent of Police, who has called him; given such allegation, let the concerned Superintendent of Police shall change inquiry Officer on the complaint and substituted respondent No.3 for further inquiry. 4. Petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. All pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of. 30.01.2025 (ANOOP CHITKARA ) smriti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SMRITI 2025.01.31 12:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment