AYAZ AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FOREST DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/13395/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183054 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183054 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13395 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned for payment of minimum of pay-scale in terms of Government Order dated 24.09.2024 and judgment rendered in the case of Sabha Shankar Dube v. Divisional Forest Officer and others [2019(12) SCC 297].
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Chief Conservator of Forest Department, U.P., Lucknow who shall consider and decide the same, in light of aforesaid judgment, in case the same is applicable, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 20, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nand Kishore Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ayaz Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench