Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183042 (ALL)

JANKI SHARAN v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF ENERGY, LKO. AND OTHERS

/14460/2025 · 2025-12-15

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14460 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Harshvardhan Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Neerav Chitravanshi, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and Mr. Alok Saran, learned counsel for respondent no.3. Present petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the punishment order dated 26.07.2025, passed by Respondent No.3, as contained in Annexure No.2 to this writ petition; (ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to not to give effect the operation and implementation of the impugned punishment order dated 26.07.2025, passed by Respondent No.3, as contained in Annexure No.2 to this writ petition; (iii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to grant consequential benefits to the Petitioner ignoring the punishment order dated 26.07.2025, passed by Respondent No.3, as contained in Annexure No.2 to this writ petition;" The contention put forth by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has preferred a statutory appeal against the punishment order dated 26th July 2025, in the month of August 2025, which is still pending consideration. He submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct respondent no.2, to decide the appeal within a stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajat Rajan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Alok Saran, Neerav Chitravanshi Janki Sharan .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Energy, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case, the respondent no.2/the Chairman, U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Shakti Bhawan, 14 Ashok Marg, Lucknow, is directed to decide the appeal of the petitioner within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition is disposed of. December 15, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 14460 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench