Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183034 (ALL)

SAUMYA @ SAUMYA TIWARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

/1027/2025 · 2025-11-28

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1027 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and final report has been forwarded against the petitioners and, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid fact. 3. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 28, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Chandra Dwivedi, Uday Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Saumya @ Saumya Tiwari And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench