Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183026 (ALL)

CHANDAN KUMAR MISHRA v. SHRI CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, LKO.

/3970/2024 · 2025-12-04

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3970 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Respondent has filed a short counter affidavit, which is taken on record. It has been stated therein that the address shown in the Recovery Certificate dated 13.08.2021 issued by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (hereinafter referred to as, the R.E.R.A.) is found to be a forged address as despite repeated visits no information has been received regarding the Firm and thereafter, the Recovery Certificate was returned to the R.E.R.A. on 10.08.2023 and thereafter no fresh Recovery Certificate has been received by the respondent. Learned Counsel for the applicant has submitted that he has another address of the Firm and he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt application and the same may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to approach R.E.R.A. for issuance of fresh Recovery Certificate as per the another address of Firm to be provided by the applicant. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as not pressed. It is always open for the applicant to avail the remedy, as may be permissible under the law. December 4, 2025 Ashish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vishal Srivastava, Shrikant Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Chandan Kumar Mishra .....Applicant(s) Shri Chandra Prakash Singh, District Magistrate, Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench