Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183024 (MAD)

Aravind v. State by, Inspector of Police

CRL RC/1628/2025 · 2025-09-04

T V Thamilselvi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL RC No. 1628 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL RC No. 1628 of 2025 1. Aravind S/o. Kaveri, Saanarpalli Village, Murkkampatti Post, Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State by, Inspector of Police, Krishnapuram police Station, Dharmapuri District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 438 & 442 of BNSS, praying to call for the records and set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District, dated 09.06.2025 in Crl.MP.No.213 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.R.Elavarasan https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1628 of 2025 For Respondent(s): Dr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner has filed this revision to set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dharmapuri, in Crl.M.P.No.213 of 2025, dated 09.06.2025. 2. Heard, Mr.M.R.Elavarasan, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr.C.E.Pratap, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), appearing for the respondent and perused the materials available in record. 3. Challenging the dismissal order passed in the Discharge Application in Crl.MP No. 213 of 2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no specific overt act attributed to him with regard to the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 506(i) of IPC. He further submits https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1628 of 2025 that, according to the prosecution, the petitioner was charged under Sections 294(b) and 323 of IPC; however, no deadly weapon was used, and this is a matter to be examined during trial. As rightly pointed out by the prosecution, there is also a counter case in STC.No. 1024 of 2024 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Dharmapuri. Therefore, the petitioner has to work out his remedy before the trial Court. 4. The other connected case is now ripe for trial and stands separated. Hence, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the case within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Since the petitioner is a student, his personal appearance is dispensed with. 5.In view of the above, this Criminal Revision case is disposed of. 04-09-2025 rri Index:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1628 of 2025 Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1628 of 2025 To 1.State by, Inspector of Police, Krishnapuram police Station, Dharmapuri District. 2. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. 3.The Public prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1628 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. rri CRL RC No. 1628 of 2025 04-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis