HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6839 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Short counter affidavit, filed by learned AGA on behalf of State today in Court, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 3. At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has also been submitted against the petitioner and as such, the instant writ petition has rendered infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous, with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 12, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Vijay Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench