Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183008 (ALL)

ANJALI SRIVASTAVA @ RUPALI SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/1226/2025 · 2025-11-10

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1226 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Dinesh Kumar, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. The Vakalatnama is taken on record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in 98 of 2024, under Section 306 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sitapur. 3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the mother-in-law and the father-in-law were granted the benefit of anticipatory bail vide orders dated 15.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/s 438 CRPC No.1149 of 2025. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer. 5. Considering and adopting the same reasoning, the applicant, who is the wife of the deceased, is also granted the benefit of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Anjali Srivastava @ Rupali Srivastava be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till conclusion of the trial on her furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.30,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suyesh Pradhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anjali Srivastava @ Rupali Srivastava .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 10, 2025 akverma ABAIL No. 1226 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench