SAMIR v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINI. OF FINANCE DEPTT. OF REVENUE NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS
/1390/2025 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182997 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182997 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT TAX No. - 1390 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner has prayed for the following substantial relief(s):
"1. Issue a writ in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the Opp. Party No.-2 to provisionally release the truck no. UP-78-CT-1791, on a Bond of full value of the seized truck in favor of petitioner. ii. Issue a Writ of MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ or order directing Opp. Party No 2 to decide the provisional release application u/s 110-A dated 15.10.2025, within a stipulated period of time."
3. Accordingly, we direct the Additional Commissioner of Customs, Commissionerate, Lucknow being respondent No.2 herein to decide the provisional release application under Section 110-A dated 15.10.2025 after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from date.
4. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. December 2, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raghvendra P. Singh, Mohd. Sheraj Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Kuldeepak Nag (K.D.Nag) (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Samir .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Mini. Of Finance Deptt. Of Revenue New Delhi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench