Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18298 (KAR)

SRI SHANKAREGOWDA v. SMT MEENAKSHAMMA

RSA/861/2019 · 2025-04-08

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15016 RSA No. 861 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 861 OF 2019 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SHANKAREGOWDA S/O ANNAPPAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 2. SMT. SHANTHAMMA W/O SHANKREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT HIRIYALU VILLAGE, GANDSI HOBLI, ARSIKERE TALUK 573103 …APPELLANTS [BY SRI. JAGADEESH H T., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: 1. SMT. MEENAKSHAMMA W/O LATE RAMESH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 2. SMT GEETHA W/O LATE LAKSHMISHA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 3. SRI. SHANKAREGOWDA S/O RAMEGOWDA, MAJOR Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15016 RSA No. 861 of 2019 4. SMT. NANJAMMA W/O RAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT THIMMALAPURA GANDSI HOBLI ARSIKERE TALUK – 573 103 …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.12.2018 PASSED IN RA.NO.60/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., ARSIKERE, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.06.2017 PASSED IN OS.NO.157/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., ARSIKERE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT Case called. None appears for the appellants. Even on the last date of hearing, none appeared for the appellants. The appeal is of the year 2019, despite granting sufficient opportunity, the appellants did not comply with the office objections. It seems that the appellants are not interested in complying with the office objections. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15016 RSA No. 861 of 2019 Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, pending I.A, does not survive for consideration and is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SKS