PAWAN YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/9892/2025 · 2025-11-06
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182974 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182974 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9892 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1.Heard Sri Vivek Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Meera Tripathi, learned AGA for the State- opposite parties No.1 to 3. 2.In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party No.4 is hereby dispensed with. 3.By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned FIR dated 03.10.2025 bearing FIR/Case Crime No.619 of 2025, under Sections 61(2)(a), 109(1), 191(1), 191(2), 191(3) & 190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station- Kotwali Ayodhya, District- Ayodhya, which is contained as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition, so far as it relates to the present petitioner.
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate has produced a copy of instructions letter dated 25.10.2025 sent by Sri Shekhar Nath Singh, Sub-Inspector, Police Station- Kotwali Ayodhya, District-Ayodhya addressing to the learned Government Advocate, High Court, Lucknow. The same is taken on record.
5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the petitioner may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law and direction may be issued to decide the same with expedition.
6. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue and considering the aforesaid innocuous request of learned counsel for the petitioner, we hereby dispose of this writ petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law within a period of two Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Kumar Verma, Prashant Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Pawan Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
weeks from today and if such anticipatory bail application is filed by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the same may be heard and disposed of expeditiously on its own merit, strictly in accordance with law.
7. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of finally. November 6, 2025 Suresh/ CRLP No. 9892 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench