HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11815 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. We are of the view that the writ petition is not maintainable here. However, we are also of the view that the fresh application filed by the petitioner under Order 39 Rule 2(A) of C.P.C. should be expeditiously heard and disposed of by the trial court below. 3. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. December 10, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Kinkar Pandey, Ashutosh Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Ansar Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench