Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182968 (ALL)

SURAJ KANAUJIYA and ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. and ANR.

A482/6639/2018 · 2025-11-06

Rajeev Bharti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6639 of 2018 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Case called out. 2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is of the year 2018 and it is listed for the first time after the year 2018, but when the case was called out, none appeared on behalf of the applicants to press this application. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 is also not present. However, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State is present. 3. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the matter. 4. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 6, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prem Kumar Singh, Vikas Srivastava Bakhshi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate, Dinesh Kr Srivastava (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Suraj Kanaujiya And Ors. .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench