ABDUL WAHEED v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
A482/9647/2025 · 2025-11-15
Tej Pratap Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182966 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182966 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9647 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the State of U.P. and perused the records.
2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the impugned N.B.W. / order dated 12.09.2025 passed by learned court of Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 4, Lucknow in Session Trial No. 180 of 2021 (State vs. Anwar Ahmad and others), arises out of F.I.R. No. 0205 of 2020, under Section 370(5) I.P.C.
3. After arguments on merits at length learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the prayer made in the present petition on merits. He submits that vide order dated 12.09.2025 non bailable warrants have been issued against the applicant. He submits that the purpose of the applicant would be served if he is permitted to appear before the trial court within a period of two weeks from today and file a regular bail application/an application for recall of non-bailable warrants.
4. Learned counsel for the State has no objection of aforesaid arguments of learned counsel for the applicant.
5. However, in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the limited prayer of learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that if the accused-applicant appears and applies for bail/an application for recall of non-bailable warrants before the court concerned Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Abdul Waheed .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
6. For a period of two weeks from today or till appearance of the applicant, whichever is earlier, the non-bailable warrants be kept in abeyance. However, if the applicant does not appear in the aforesaid time, the court concerned shall proceed as per law.
7. The present application is disposed of. November 15, 2025 Manoj/NSC A482 No. 9647 of 2025 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench