HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6011 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 20, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shantanu Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., A.S.G., Puneet Chandra, Sabitra Vardhan Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vikesh Kumar And 2 Ors. .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru Secy.Ministry Of Rural Development And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench