SUNIL KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LKO.andORS.
WRIA/23557/2017 · 2025-12-04
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182960 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182960 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 23557 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 4, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Pandey, Deo Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar, Jyoti Sikka (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Sunil Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko.Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench