APHC010254132020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16715/2020 Between: BANDLAMUDI GANDHI, S/O POTHURAJU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC LECTURER, R/O.DOOR NO.4-5-85, 5/1, KORITEPADU, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, OLD GUNTUR POLICE STATION, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , NALLAPADU POLICE STATION, NALLAPADU, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. VEERA SWAMY, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NALLAPADU POLICE STATION, NALLAPADU, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. AMARAVARDHAN, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NALLAPADU POLICE STATION, NALLAPADU, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. ANJANEYUIU, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NALLAPADU POLICE STATION, NALLAPADU, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. NOTU SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O NARASAREDDY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.1-477, SF-6, GSR RESIDENCY, GUJJANAGUNDLA, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G KONDALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action on the part of the respondent No.3 to 7 in pressurizing the petitioner to get settle the civil dispute, as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power, apart from being violation of fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to take action against the respondent No.3 to 7 for pressurizing the petitioner to settle the civil disputes with the respondent No.8.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri G.Kondala Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter as the relief sought in this petition has become infructuous. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:10.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16715 of 2020 Dt.10.09.2025 Dinesh