Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182950 (ALL)

DR. BRIJ RANI PANDEY v. U.O.I. THRU. ITS SECY. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, DEPTT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY AND 3 OTHERS

CMRAD/180/2025 · 2025-11-12

Manjive Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 180 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. (Order on C.M.Application No.1 of 2025; Application for Condonation of Delay) 1. Heard Dr. Brij Rani Pandey, applicant-In person. 2. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 35 days in filing the review application which is supported with an affidavit. 3. The cause shown and the explanations offered in the affidavit in support of the application for condonation of delay are accepted. The application for condonation of delay is allowed. The delay is condoned. (Order on Memo of Review Application) 1. We have heard the applicant appearing in In-person and also perused the grounds of the review application. We have also perused our judgment dated 12.08.2025 review of which has been sought. 2. It is settled principle of law that rehearing cannot take place in the garb of a review application. Only errors apparent or grounds Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : In Person Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Dr. Brij Rani Pandey .....Applicant(s) U.O.I. Thru. Its Secy. Ministry Of Education, Deptt. Of School Education And Literacy And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) analogous to the principles contained in Order 47 Rule 1 C.P.C. can be pressed for seeking a review. None of which are available in this case. We do not find any valid ground for reviewing our judgment dated 12.08.2025. 3. We, accordingly, reject the application for review. November 12, 2025 -Piyush- CMRAD No. 180 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench