[2025:RJ-JP:19614] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 6146/2025 Suman Devi D/o Shri Roshan Lal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Manak Tibbi, Police Station Surawali, District Hanumangarh (Raj.). (Accused Petitioner Is In Confinement At Centrla Jail Jaipur And In Custody Since 30.01.2025) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 09/05/2025 1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.09/2025 registered at Police Station Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS and SOG for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6, 2(F)(ii) and 10 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Measures For Prevention of Unfair Means In Recruitment) Act, 2022. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the sim card which has been used allegedly during the examination period belongs to some Vijendra Singh and the other mobile number was in the name of Krishan Kumar which [2025:RJ-JP:19614] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6146/2025] were issued much prior to the date of the examination. It is also contended that the sim recovered by the Investigating Agency were not in the name of the petitioner and sim were issued in the name of other persons. The petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2025 and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the second bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner- Suman appeared in examination conducted by the Rajasthan High Court for the post of Junior Judicial Assistant, Clerk Grade-II adopted malpractice and got selected in the said examination. It is also contended that the tower location of the mobile number used by the petitioner was found in the vicinity of the examination centre and she was in continuous contact with some other mobile number during the period of examination. It is also contended that during period of examination, the petitioner was in contact with some other person through mobile phone for approx 7200 seconds and 6093 seconds, therefore, considering the above facts the, the second bail application of the petitioner deserves to be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is alleged against the petitioner that she adopted malpractices and got selected in the examination for the post of Junior Judicial Assistant, Clerk Grade-II conducted by the Rajasthan High Court through cheating. The tower location of the mobile phone used by the petitioner was also found near to the [2025:RJ-JP:19614] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6146/2025] examination centre and she was in contact with some other person during the period of examination. Therefore, considering the above facts, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Hence, the second bail application of the accused-petitioner is hereby, dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/6