Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182948 (ALL)

VIKAS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

/11983/2025 · 2025-12-02

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11983 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.86 of 2025, under Sections 87, 64(1), 137(2) of BNS and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Misrikh, District Sitapur. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently, in the statement under Section 183 of BNSS, the victim did not support the prosecution case and stated that she had gone along with the applicant to Punjab. The tentative age of the victim is around 17 years. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the two statements of the victim not supporting the prosecution case and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 11.05.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Vikas be released on bail in the aforesaid first Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dilip Kumar Singh Chauhan, Smita Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vikas .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 2, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 11983 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench