MAMTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/10184/2025 · 2025-10-30
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182942 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182942 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10184 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. We have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that till date, the claim of the petitioner under the Mukhyamantri Kisan Durghatna Kalyan Yojna has not been finally decided. He further submits that the matter is going to be decided on November 15, 2025.
3. In light of the above submissions, the respondent-authority is directed to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner on November 15, 2025 and thereafter pass a reasoned order in accordance with law.
4. We make it clear that the order should be a detailed order providing proper reasons.
5. In the event the petitioner is found not to be eligible, the authorities must provide the reasons along with proof as to why the petitioner is not entitled to the compensation.
6. In the event the petitioner is found to be eligible, the compensation should be paid to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from date.
7. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 30, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Subhash Chandra Yadav, Ashok Kumar Bhaskar, Ashwani Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Mamta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench