VED NATH DUBEY v. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECY AND 3 ORS
WRIA/744/2006 · 2025-11-07
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182938 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182938 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 744 of 2006 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
1. Heard Shri Pankaj Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent(s).
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the result dated 27.10.2005 declared by the Departmental Promotion Committee.
3. Today no one is present for the petitioner neither in the first call nor in the revised call. Perusal of the order sheet shows that no one has appeared in this matter since the year 2008.
4. In view thereof, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, interim order, if any, is vacated. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner in case any cause survives.
5. File may be consigned to record room. November 7, 2025 Praveen Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prince Lenin Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) Ved Nath Dubey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Through Its Chief Secy And 3 Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench