HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11675 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the application dated November 17, 2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid application before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the application of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.2/ District Magistrate, Amethi is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid application of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. December 2, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Saurabh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench