Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182932 (ALL)

ADITYA PRAKASH DUBEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/12384/2025 · 2025-10-30

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12384 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to permit petitioner to appear in the physical efficiency test for purposes of recruitment on the the post of U.P. Police Radio Head Operator/Head Operator (Mechanical) for direct recruitment, 2022. 3. Learned State Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 29.10.2025, a copy of which is taken on record and as per which petitioner was unable to produce his original documents pertaining to educational qualifications at the time of document verification. However, the Committee concerned provisionally considered petitioner's candidature but the Recruitment Board disallowed his candidature. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the original documentation pertaining to diploma of petitioner on the subject concerned could not be produced since it was not available at that time and the same is now available with petitioner. It is submitted that in similar circumstances, candidates have been permitted to produce the original documentation subsequently. Petitioner is claiming similar benefits. 5. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances, particularly since the aspect of such relaxation would come within executive domain, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party no.3 i.e. Chairman, Uttar Pradesh Police Recruitment & Promotion Board, Lucknow, who Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Narendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Aditya Prakash Dubey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) may consider and decide petitioner's representation within a period of two weeks from the date of filing representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order before authority concerned. 6. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. October 30, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 12384 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench