HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10155 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the petitioners is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Ram Asarey Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Nikhil Singh, learned AGA. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major in age and they have solemnized their marriage with their sweet Will and volition on 13.10.2025 at Arya Samaj Buddh Vihar, Chinhat, Lucknow. A copy of the Marriage Certificate has been annexed alongwith supplementary affidavit as SA 1. However, since the respondent no.4, who is father of the petitioner no.1, and her family members were not ready for the marriage, therefore, the police is harassing the petitioners on their instigation. 4. Sri Nikhil Singh, learned AGA, on the basis of instructions dated 26.10.2025 received from Surendra Pratap Yadav, Sub Inspector, Police Station Imliya Sultanpur, District Sitapur, which has been produced before this Court and taken on record, submits that the petition has been filed on misconceived and baseless grounds because neither any F.I.R. is lodged against the petitioner no.2 nor the police is harassing the petitioners in any manner and in case anybody is harassing the petitioners, they are free to approach to the concerned police station for lodging the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Asarey Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Arati Mishra And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) F.I.R. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be disposed of in terms of the statement of learned AGA. 6. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to the respondent no.2 is dispensed with. 7. In view of above, the petition is disposed of in terms of the statement of learned AGA. Even otherwise, the petitioners are entitled for the benefit of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, 2006 (5) SCC 475. November 10, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- CRLP No. 10155 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench