HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11612 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Avinash Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 and 2 as well as Shri Avadhesh Shukla, learned counsel for opposite party no.3- the Uttar Pradesh Gramin Bank. 2. By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has challenged the validity of recovery citation dated 26.08.2025 but at the outset learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner is unable to repay the amount due to financial constraint and in case he is granted liberty to make payment in easy installments, the petitioner would pay the amount. 3. The learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of by providing that in case the petitioner deposits Rs. 40,000/- within a period of two weeks from today, with the opposite party no.3, the opposite party no.3 shall give a revised payment schedule to the petitioner, under which the petitioner would have the facility of making payments in monthly installments of Rs. 10,000/- and the last installment would include the entire residual amount due, including interest. 5. In case the petitioner keeps on making payments in installments as aforesaid, no coercive measure shall be taken against him. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Avdhesh Shukla Surya Prakash Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector / Distt. Magistrate Distt. Fiazabad And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. In case the petitioner commits make default in payment of any installment, the benefits of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. December 1, 2025 Muk WRIC No. 11612 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench