Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182892 (ALL)

SHYAM SUNDAR TIWARI v. ANIL KUMAR AND 7 OTHERS

A227/7059/2025 · 2025-12-10

Subhash Vidyarthi

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7059 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Niyaj Ahmad, the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Ambedkar Nagar to decide the Original Suit No.984 of 2020 titled Shyam Sundar Tiwari v. Purushottam Tiwari and Anr. expeditiously. 3. Keeping in view the nature of relief sought and order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondents is dispensed with. 4. The aforesaid suit has been filed by the petitioner for a decree of partition. The suit is amongst decedents of a common ancestor. Although the order-sheet of trial Court shows that on numerous occasions, the suit could not proceed because of strike of Advocates but on several dates, the hearing has been adjourned without assigning any reason. Early disposal of the partition suit amongst members of the same family, would be expedient in the interest of justice. 5. The instant petition is disposed off by issuing a direction to Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Ambedkar Nagar to decide the Original Suit No.984 of 2020 titled Shyam Sundar Tiwari v. Purushottam Tiwari and Anr. expeditiously, in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties and by fixing dates at short intervals. December 10, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Niyaj Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Shyam Sundar Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) Anil Kumar And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench