HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14209 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Akhilesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 4, Mr. Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3, Mr. Nitish Sekhar, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to provide the pension from the date 20.08.2019 to 15.06.2021 along with 18% interest which was illegally held by the respondent. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 4 i.e. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), to take decision on the representation dated 03.12.20225 moved by the petitioner as soon as possible or within a time as stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. (in) Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. iv) Allow the writ petition with heavy cost." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 4 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Mohan Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Akhilesh Pratap Singh, Rishabh Tripathi Pawan Kumar Srivastav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 4/Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner(Pension), Opposite Carmel Girls School Civil Line, Labour Camp, Gorakhpur, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within further period of six weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. December 10, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 14209 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench