Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182879 (ALL)

RAJEEV SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TECHNICAL EDUCATION LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/5105/2024 · 2025-12-05

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5105 of 2024 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Nischal Jagdhari, learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 & 5, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the material on record. Instant petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the Opp. Parties to pay the petitioner his due payment of Rs 20,000/-against conducting the 40th Practical Examination O Level Program July 2023 from 13.09.2023 to 16.09.2023," Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.3 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shubham Chaurasiya, Saurabh Yadav, Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Maneeshi Srivastava, Nischal Jagdhari, Punit Kumar Trivedi Rajeev Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Technical Education Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3/Director, National Institute of Information Technology, Lucknow within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.3 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. December 5, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 5105 of 2024 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench