Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182869 (ALL)

VIJAY NARAYAN UPADHYAY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MADHYAMIK SIKSHA SECONDARY EDUCATION U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

/13514/2025 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13514 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Since, the present matter is being decided at the admission stage, therefore, notices to opposite parties no. 4 & 5 are hereby dispensed with. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri P.K.Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :- "1. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties particularly opposite Party No. 2 and 3 to provide the promotional pay scale salary to the petitioner in respect of the order dated 29.11.2023 passed by Opposite Party No. 3 from the order date i.e. 29.11.2023, (Annexure No. 3), in the interest of justice." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation on 02 -09-2025 before the opposite party no. 3/District Inspector of Schools, District-Pratapgarh and the same is pending consideration. He further submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the opposite party no. 3 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Durgesh Mishra, Abhishek Shukla, Manvendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vijay Narayan Upadhyay .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Madhyamik Siksha Secondary Education U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case, the opposite party no. 3/District Inspector of Schools, District- Pratapgarh, is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 02-09-2025 within a period of eight weeks, in accordance with law, from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. November 26, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 13514 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench