VINITA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
/11217/2025 · 2025-11-27
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182847 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182847 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11217 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Heard Sri Amit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This petition has been filed seeking following main relief:-
"(i) a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.1 to 3 not to harass the petitioners on the behest of the opposite party no.4, in the interest of justice."
3. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are major and they have married with each other by their own free will on 20.11.2025 as per Hindu rites at Arya Samaj Mandir, Sector- H, Aliganj, Lucknow. Copy of their marriage certificate issued from the Arya Samaj Mandir is annexed as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. In regard to their age, the petitioner No.1 has annexed copy of her Aadhaar Card & Ration Card whereas petitioner No.2 has annexed copy of his Aadhaar Card as Annexure Nos.2 and 3 to the writ petition respectively. They are enjoying and living peaceful matrimonial life. However, opposite party no.4, who is father of the petitioner No.1, is not happy with the marriage, therefore, on his instance, the police is harassing the petitioners. So, they have approached this Court, for redressal of their grievances, by filing the present writ petition.
4. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions dated 24.11.2025 received Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Vinita And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
from Sri Pushkar Verma, Sub Inspector, Police Station Dhauraha, District Kheri, submits that no F.I.R. or Missing Report has been registered at the concerned police station and the police is not interfering in the peaceful life of the petitioners, who are enjoying their marital life happily. The said instructions are taken on record.
5. In view of above, there is no occasion to disbelieve the statement of learned A.G.A. on the basis of aforesaid instructions and this petition is disposed of in terms of the statement of learned A.G.A. November 27, 2025 Saurabh CRLP No. 11217 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench